Obama is “Judge, Jury and Executioner” of Both Drone and Cyber-Attacks? | SOURCE ONE NEWS
Rss Feed

Orlando Shooting: As Expected, Israel Spin Doctors Move To Exploit Orlando Massacre<----SOURCE ONE----Orlando Shooting: Ex-Wife, Pulse Patrons Say Omar Mateen Was Gay, Regularly Attended LGBT Nightclubs<----SOURCE ONE----Dwight D. Eisenhower The "Terrible Swedish Jew" Was A Mass Murderer<----SOURCE ONE----Killing Palestinians! Israel Creating Another Holocaust Like The Armenian and Ukrainian Holocausts That The Jews Did<----SOURCE ONE----Orlando Shooting: Like 9/11 Israel Quick To Take Advantage Of Terror, Seems Very Suspect<----SOURCE ONE----Was The Orlando Shooting A False Flag To Counter Positive Islam Press After Muhammad Ali Death?<----SOURCE ONE----Do Crisis Actors Like The Ones Alleged In The Orlando Shooting Get Paid-Off By Donations?<----SOURCE ONE----False Flag! WTF? Where Were The Ambulances? The Fog Of Breaking News In Orlando Shooting<----SOURCE ONE----Did Crazy Zionist Warmonger Lindsey Graham Attend Bilderberg 2016?<----SOURCE ONE----Bizarre Oddities: Was The Pulse Nightclub Shooting A False Flag Operation?<----SOURCE ONE----Crisis Actors Fake Crying? Collection Of Those That Believe The Orlando Shooting Was Another Hoax For Gun Grab<----SOURCE ONE----Anomalies: More To The Story About The Registered Democrat And Alleged ISIS Orlando Shooter<----SOURCE ONE----Danger! Fluoride Is A Neurotoxic Chemical Waste Byproduct That Damages Bones And Brain Function<----SOURCE ONE----US Law Enforcement Knew Florida Shooter BEFORE Shooting In Orlando<----SOURCE ONE----False Flag? 5 Reasons To Question The Official Story Of The Orlando Shooting<----SOURCE ONE----Could You Imagine A Crazy Killer Warmonger Like Hillary Clinton With Access To Nuclear Weapons?<----SOURCE ONE----Nevada Becomes The First State To Test Fully Automated Passenger Drones<----SOURCE ONE----Billionaire Paypal Founder Peter Thiel Goes On The Record About Bilderberg 2016<----SOURCE ONE----Zionist Henry Kissinger Called A Murderer As He Did His Bilderberg 2016 Walk Of Shame<----SOURCE ONE----David Petraeus Caught At Bilderberg 2016, Runs Away After Questions<----SOURCE ONE----Scary Conflict Of Interest For Obama To Endorse Hillary Clinton During An FBI Investigation About Her Emails<----SOURCE ONE----Know Thy Enemy: How You Are Enslaved And Why You Don't Even Know It<----SOURCE ONE----Surviving the Matrix: Mind Control In The Modern World - Propaganda Zombies<----SOURCE ONE----Extreme Weather: Planet X Incoming, Birth Pangs May 2016<----SOURCE ONE----Caught On Video: Shocking Shooting At Dallas Love Airport Field Baggage Claim<----SOURCE ONE----CREATING FRANKENFOOD - ANIMAL PHARM - INSIDE GMO TRANSGENICS AND CLONING<----SOURCE ONE----Opinion: Israel Acts With Evil Impunity And Is Still Welcomed Everywhere<----SOURCE ONE----The Question Is Asked Is The Tel Aviv Shootings A False Flag Inside-Job?<----SOURCE ONE----Ken O’Keefe: Israeli Ownership Of The US Government, Jewish Supremacy, The Talmud And Nuclear Holocaust<----SOURCE ONE----VIDEO: Donald Trump: Calls Out The Crooked Clintons “It’s A Sad Day In America”

no one deals like we do!

Home // Big Brother News // Obama is “Judge, Jury and Executioner” of Both Drone and Cyber-Attacks?

Obama is “Judge, Jury and Executioner” of Both Drone and Cyber-Attacks?

Microsoft-Badge a-googleplay
Amazon-preorder

As Obama grandstands and uses the Sandy Hook crisis to, in the words of Eric Holder “brainwash the public” that guns are bad and the cause of violent crime and misery, We decided to show just a few of the documented cases of drone attacks that he personally ordered where children were killed. Drone attack after drone attack you will see the real face of the Globalists. This man does not care about children he cares about disarming the American people to bring in a totalitarian government.

The White House is “Judge, Jury and Executioner” of Both Drone and Cyber-Attacks

Source: Washington’s Blog

NBC News reports:

Legal experts expressed grave reservations Tuesday about an Obama administration memo concluding that the United States can order the killing of American citizens believed to be affiliated with al-Qaida — with one saying the White House was acting as “judge, jury and executioner.”

Anyone should be concerned when the president and his lawyers make up their own interpretation of the law or their own rules,” said Mary Ellen O’Connell, a law professor at the University of Notre Dame and an authority on international law and the use of force.

“This is a very, very dangerous thing that the president has done,” she added.

***

Glenn Greenwald, a constitutional lawyer who writes about security and liberty for the British newspaper The Guardian, described the memo as “fundamentally misleading,” with a clinical tone that disguises “the radical and dangerous power it purports to authorize.”

“If you believe the president has the power to order U.S. citizens executed far from any battlefield with no charges or trial, then it’s truly hard to conceive of any asserted power you would find objectionable,” he wrote.

Senator Wyden said:

Every American has the right to know when their government believes that it is allowed to kill them.

Top constitutional law expert Jonathan Turley notes:

In plain language, [the Obama administration memo] means that [any Americans can be assassinated if] the President considers the citizens to be a threat in the future. Moreover, the memo allows killings when an attempt to capture the person would pose an “undue risk” to U.S. personnel. That undue risk is left undefined.

I think I’ve seen that movie before

Given that drones are being deployed in the American homeland, some fear that the war is coming home.

Indeed, the military now considers the U.S. homeland to be a battlefield. The U.S. is already allowingmilitary operations within the United States. The Army is already being deployed on U.S. soil, and the military is conducting numerous training exercises on American streets. (For more background, see this,this, this, this, and this.)

Similarly, the White House has claimed the unilateral power to launch pre-emptive cyber-strikes against foreign nations. As FireDogLake notes:

Like with the drone program, President Barack Obama is presiding over the creation and development of a power that previous presidents never imagined having. The national security state is effectively appointing him and all future presidents the proverbial judge, jury and executioner when it comes to cyber warfare.

As Greenwald makes clear, virtually all of the U.S. efforts regarding so-called “cyber-security” areactually efforts to create offensive attack capabilities.

And given that the government may consider normal Americans who criticize any government policy to be terrorists – and that the military is fighting against dissent on the Internet – it is obvious that the cyber-attack capabilities are coming home to roost.

Of course, indiscriminate drone strikes are war crimes (and here and here) , and cyber-attacks are aform of terrorism. But that won’t stop the U.S. … because it’s only terrorism when other people do what we do.

As Greenwald noted last year:

We supposedly learned important lessons from the abuses of power of the Nixon administration, and then of the Bush administration: namely, that we don’t trust government officials to exercise power in the dark, with no judicial oversight, with no obligation to prove their accusations. Yet now we hear exactly this same mentality issuing from Obama, his officials and defenders to justify a far more extreme power than either Nixon or Bush dreamed of asserting: he’s only killing The Bad Citizens, so there’s no reason to object!

Bookmark and Share

Microsoft-Badge a-googleplay
Amazon-preorder

Greenwald notes in an article today:

The core distortion of the War on Terror under both Bush and Obama is the Orwellian practice of equating government accusations of terrorism with proof of guilt. One constantly hears US government defenders referring to “terrorists” when what they actually mean is: those accused by the government of terrorism. This entire memo is grounded in this deceit.

Time and again, it emphasizes that the authorized assassinations are carried out “against a senior operational leader of al-Qaida or its associated forces who poses an imminent threat of violent attack against the United States.” Undoubtedly fearing that this document would one day be public, Obama lawyers made certain to incorporate this deceit into the title itself: “Lawfulness of a Lethal Operation Directed Against a US Citizen Who is a Senior Operational Leader of al-Qaida or An Associated Force.”

This ensures that huge numbers of citizens – those who spend little time thinking about such things and/or authoritarians who assume all government claims are true – will instinctively justify what is being done here on the ground that we must kill the Terroristsor joining al-Qaida means you should be killed. That’s the “reasoning” process that has driven the War on Terror since it commenced: if the US government simply asserts without evidence or trial that someone is a terrorist, then they are assumed to be, and they can then be punished as such – with indefinite imprisonment or death.

But of course, when this memo refers to “a Senior Operational Leader of al-Qaida”, what it actually means is this: someone whom the President – in total secrecy and with no due process – has accused of being that. Indeed, the memo itself makes this clear, as it baldly states that presidential assassinations are justified when “an informed, high-level official of the US government has determined that the targeted individual poses an imminent threat of violent attack against the US”.

This is the crucial point: the memo isn’t justifying the due-process-free execution of senior al-Qaida leaders who pose an imminent threat to the US. It is justifying the due-process-free execution of people secretly accused by the president and his underlings, with no due process, of being that. The distinction between (a) government accusations and (b) proof of guilt is central to every free society, by definition, yet this memo – and those who defend Obama’s assassination power – willfully ignore it.

Those who justify all of this by arguing that Obama can and should kill al-Qaida leaders who are trying to kill Americans are engaged in supreme question-begging. Without any due process, transparency or oversight, there is no way to know who is a “senior al-Qaida leader” and who is posing an “imminent threat” to Americans. All that can be known is who Obama, in total secrecy, accuses of this.

(Indeed, membership in al-Qaida is not even required to be assassinated, as one can be a member of a group deemed to be an “associated force” of al-Qaida, whatever that might mean: a formulation so broad and ill-defined that, as Law Professor Kevin Jon Hellerargues, it means the memo “authorizes the use of lethal force against individuals whose targeting is, without more, prohibited by international law”.)

The definition of an extreme authoritarian is one who is willing blindly to assume that government accusations are true without any evidence presented or opportunity to contest those accusations. This memo – and the entire theory justifying Obama’s kill list – centrally relies on this authoritarian conflation of government accusations and valid proof of guilt.

They are not the same and never have been. Political leaders who decree guilt in secret and with no oversight inevitably succumb to error and/or abuse of power. Such unchecked accusatory decrees are inherently untrustworthy (indeed, Yemen expertshave vehemently contested the claim that Awlaki himself was a senior al-Qaida leaderposing an imminent threat to the US). That’s why due process is guaranteed in the Constitution and why judicial review of government accusations has been a staple of western justice since the Magna Carta: because leaders can’t be trusted to decree guilt and punish citizens without evidence and an adversarial process. That is the age-old basic right on which this memo, and the Obama presidency, is waging war.

We’ve previously pointed out the absurdity of the government’s circular reasoning in the context of indefinite detention:

The government’s indefinite detention policy – stripped of it’s spin – is literally insane, and based on circular reasoning. Stripped of p.r., this is the actual policy:

– If you are an enemy combatant or a threat to national security, we will detain youindefinitely until the war is over

– It is a perpetual war, which will never be over

Neither you or your lawyers have a right to see the evidence against you, nor to face your accusers

– But trust us, we know you are an enemy combatant and a threat to national security

– We may torture you (and try to cover up the fact that you were tortured), because you are an enemy combatant, and so basic rights of a prisoner guaranteed by the Geneva Convention don’t apply to you

– Since you admitted that you’re a bad guy (while trying to tell us whatever you think we want to hear to make the torture stop), it proves that we should hold you in indefinite detention

See how that works?

The Founding Fathers are rolling in their graves, as the separation of powers they fought and died for is being destroyed. We’ve gone from a nation of laws to a nation of powerful men making laws in secret, where Congressional leaders themselves aren’t even allowed to see the laws, or to learn about covert programs. A nation where Congressmen are threatened with martial law if they don’t approve radical programs.

Indeed, Bush and Obama have literally set the clock back 800 years … to before the signing of the Magna Carta.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Popular Media From The Web

Call Now: 877-881-5420

SPY & KNOW - HIDDEN CAMERAS, SURVEILLANCE, GPS TRACKING, SELF DEFENSE - PROTECT YOURSELF AND FAMILY - SPYKNOW.COM

The Truth Tale - iTunes

Top Trending Music From - The Truth Tale

New Music Promotion - Music By The Truth Tale (Some Songs May Be PG)

Songs Available At: Bandcamp - iTunes - Google Play - Amazon - Spotify

Top Trending Stories From Web
Posted in Big Brother News, Latest News, News, News On The Edge, Offbeat News, Opinion, Politics and tagged as , ,
  • max1media

    Obama needs to be arrested along with all the criminals that helped him drone kill children